Apr. 25

Pres map

Pres polls: (None)
Dem pickups: (None)
GOP pickups: FL IA MI OH PA WI

Previous | Next

Michael Flynn in Hot Water

In his time, former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn has had dealings with Russia and with Turkey. Those dealings, we learned on Tuesday, resulted in Flynn being paid many thousands of dollars by the governments of those two countries. Flynn did not see fit to mention these payments in the paperwork he filed when requesting a security clearance. That is a violation of federal law.

This news came to light after Reps. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) and Elijah Cummings (D-MD) examined documents related to Flynn, and discovered the "oversight." They requested further documentation from the White House, so as to fully assess the extent of Flynn's misbehavior. The Trump administration is eager to get to the bottom of this, and wants to show that their vetting process was not sloppy and poorly-handled, and so promptly complied with the request. No, wait, that's not what happened at all. Instead, the White House refused to share any of their records regarding Flynn's appointment, thus leaving all sorts of questions unanswered, like, "What did they know about Flynn, and when did they know it?" and "What is the White House trying to hide?"

Meanwhile, we find ourselves in a curious situation where a conservative Republican congressman from Utah—who is trying to score points with the large number of anti-Trump Republicans in the Beehive State—is quickly becoming as popular with Democrats as Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA). Politics does indeed make strange bedfellows. (Z)

Judge: No Defunding "Sanctuary Cities"

Between Jason Chaffetz, the Freedom Caucus, and the difficulties he's having with wall funding, healthcare, and lowering taxes, Donald Trump is no great fan of the legislative branch these days. But that's nothing compared to his frustrations with the judicial branch. On Tuesday, once again, a federal judge has blocked part of the President's agenda, issuing an injunction that stops the Justice Dept. and the Dept. of Homeland Security from withholding federal funds from "sanctuary cities."

The judge is William H. Orrick—who, incidentally, is not Mexican and does not serve "on an island in the Pacific." His ruling came in response to a suit filed by Santa Clara, San Francisco, and other cities, one that argues that the President's order to withhold funding is unconstitutional and would cause "irreparable harm." Orrick agreed with the "harm" part of the argument, and said it is plausible the cities could prevail on the "unconstitutional" claim—hence the injunction. The White House has not yet indicated how it will proceed, though they cannot be happy that a final decision will rest with the Ninth Circuit, generally regarded as the most liberal of the 12 regional circuits. (Z)

Trump Eager to Appoint a Second SCOTUS Justice

While Donald Trump is not too happy with the lower levels of the federal judiciary, he just loves the Supreme Court, particularly the thought of sending a second appointee to the bench. This week, Senate Judiciary Committee chair Chuck Grassley (R-IA) suggested that the President might get that chance as early this summer. Either the Senator is engaging in some speculation and/or wishful thinking, or he has inside information about the plans of Anthony Kennedy (or, possibly, Clarence Thomas).

Though Trump appears to have little interest in filling most federal jobs (the Senate is still waiting for nominees for 475 of the 554 jobs that require their approval), he already has a list of possibilities for a possible open seat:

The three major themes of the list are: (1) fairly young, (2) solidly conservative, and (3) designed to put Anthony Kennedy at ease. If Donald Trump does get to make a second appointment, the nomination of that person (along will Gorsuch) will almost certainly be the most consequential thing Trump does during his entire presidency. (Z)

Trade Wars: Win Some, Lose Some

It's been a day since the Trump administration hit Canadian timber producers with a 20-24% tariff, and the President's reasoning is becoming clear. Like much of what Trump does (see Afghanistan, MOAB dropped in) the tariff is primarily for show, so the President can say he's standing up for Americans in the face of evil foreign corporations. And unlike, say, China, Canada is unlikely to retaliate because they have few means of doing so that wouldn't be more harmful to them than to the U.S.

That said, Trump may eventually learn that every action he takes has consequences, even if they are not immediately evident. In the case of the timber tariff, the burden will weigh most heavily on the companies who build housing in states along the Canadian border, particularly in the Midwest and the mountain states. This is an industry that was very supportive of Trump's campaign. Those homebuilders will pass on as much of the cost as they can to their customers, with the average estimated at somewhere between $1,000 and $3,500 per house. The extra cost is most likely to affect poorer, first-time homebuyers, particularly in the Midwest and the mountain states. This is a group that was very supportive of Trump's campaign, and the increased price is likely to put home ownership out of reach for roughly 150,000 of them. So, the President isn't the only one learning about unexpected consequences.

That's not the only bad news for Trump on the trade front, either. The United States and Mexico have been arguing for years over tuna, with the American government saying that Mexico's tuna is not dolphin-safe, and the Mexican government saying that it is. Based on its position, the U.S. government has imposed more than $100 million in penalties on Mexican fishermen. On Tuesday, the World Trade Organization ruled in Mexico's favor, and said they could impose $163 million in trade sanctions to recover the payments they have made. So, the tariff gods giveth, and the tariff gods taketh away. (Z)

Bannon Loses Again

Barring an unexpected reversal, which is always possible with President Trump, there won't be any money for the Mexican wall in the forthcoming budget, and the government will not shut down. This is not how one Steve Bannon wanted to play it. He and his allies pushed very hard for the President to stand firm, with Bannon declaring, "This is a stand worth taking. We're drawing a line in the sand." The former Breitbart publisher is certainly passionate about his ideas, though—befitting an outsider who has spent his career trying to bring the system down—he clearly has no idea how to actually get anything done in Washington.

This news raises, yet again, two obvious questions. First, is Bannon going to get tired of losing, over and over? And second, is Trump going to get tired of having a right-hand man who is on the impractical and impolitic side of every single issue? Time will tell, though "time" will undoubtedly get heavy input from Bannon supporter and Trump underwriter Rebekah Mercer. (Z)

Sessions: Hawaii Slam Was Just a Joke

Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III is not the apologizing type. His ill-conceived remarks once cost him a federal judgeship, and he didn't apologize for those, so there was little chance he was going to apologize for his snotty comments about Judge Derrick Watson and his home state of Hawaii. Since that declaration a week ago, Sessions has insisted that, "I wasn't criticizing the judge or the island," and also lamented that, "Nobody has a sense of humor any more."

Clearly, Sessions is learning well from his new boss, Donald Trump. In particular, the art of dissembling, in which Trump has an eight-degree black belt. There isn't anything remotely joke-like about Sessions' cheap shot at Hawaii, and there was much about it that was critical of both the judge and the islands (the AG does not seem to understand that Hawaii is not a single island). For him to offer those two flimsy excuses/explanations with a straight face is positively Trump-like. Unfortunately for him, it is also Trump-like that he's taken a story that easily could have disappeared after 24 hours, and kept it alive for six or seven news cycles. (Z)

Clinton Trolls Trump

As Janis Joplin once observed, "freedom is just another word for nothin' left to lose." The Clintons' political careers appear to be over, which means they are now in the "nothin' left to lose" category, and so have the freedom to toy with Donald Trump at will. Bill Clinton, though notoriously technophobic, nonetheless took a shot at the President with his Twitter account:

BREAKING: We just learned that the @ClintonCenter has been bugged. pic.twitter.com/4Or6lrnRPN

— Bill Clinton (@billclinton) April 23, 2017

Your play, Donald. (Z)


Back to the main page