There has been some discussion
in the blogosphere of late about why Democratic women did so badly in House races in 2006. Everyone knows
that the Democrats picked up 30 seats and took control of the House, but there have been few breakdowns by
gender. What result you get depends on which races you look at, of course. Looking at all races mixes
up top-drawer races like IL-06, where veteran Tammy Duckworth (D) went down to defeat despite heavy party
support with races where a woman was the sacrificial lamb in a race she was expected to lose badly, such as
Nancy Boyda (D) in KS-02 --only in this case Boyda won despite getting no funding from the DCCC.
This site tracked 50 Hot House races in 2006. They were chosen because they were expected to be close.
The gender of the candidates did not play a role in their selection. Let's take a look at the results and
see if Democratic women did badly.
The notation (R*) means that the seat was open but the Republicans were the incumbent party.
The analysis continues below the table.
In these 50 races, the Democrats won 34 and Republicans won 16, for a 68% Democratic victory rate.
In 36 of these races, the Democrats fielded a male candidate. Of these, 30 won and 6 lost,
for an incredible 83% win rate.
In the 14 races where the Democrat was a woman, 3 won and 11 lost, for a 21% win rate.
You don't need a graduate degree in statistics to see this could not possibly have been due to chance.
Actually, it is even worse than it looks, because all the Democratic women who won
had a special edge specific to their race. In AZ-08, there was a bitter Republican primary and the
establishment candidate lost. The winner, Randy Graf, was so far to the right that the national
Republican party abandoned him and in effect conceded the election to Giffords. In NY-20 , the
incumbent Republican, John Sweeney, beat his wife badly enough for her to call the police.
Democratic challenger Kirsten Gillibrand made a big deal about this. While Sweeney was able to beat
his wife, he wasn't able to beat his challenger. The third woman Democrat who won was Melissa Bean,
the incumbent. No Democratic woman running as the challenger was able to defeat an incumbent
Republican except where the Republican shot himself in the foot,
not even in the three districts where the incumbent Republican was a woman.
In contrast, the 22 male Democrats facing sitting Republicans won 16 of their races (73%).
What's going on here? Numerous explanations have been tossed out, including:
Women don't have what it takes in the tough races
The DCCC didn't fund the women adequately
The voters wan macho hero types
Emily's List, which funded many of the women, was like a ball-and-chain
It is easy to dispose of the first explanation. In NH-01 Carol Shea-Porter came out
of nowhere, with no help at all from the DCCC to take down a sitting two-term Republican
and in KS-02 , Nancy Boyda, likewise with no help from the DCCC, defeated five-term
Republican and former track star Jim Ryun.
Explanation two may be true, but there are numerous male Democrats who the DCCC also
ignored and who won (e.g., Jason Altmire in PA-04 ).
If explanation 3 held water, then Tammy Duckworth, an Iraq war veteran and double
amputee should have won the open seat in IL-06 against a lawyer. She didn't.
The fourth one might have some merit. The DCCC had only one litmus test: Can the candidate win?
Ideology didn't matter much, with the DCCC happy to support pro-life Democrats where it looked
like they could win. Emily's List would never support a pro-life woman, even if the woman
was otherwise acceptable. It is hard to tell how big this factor is. Still there must be
a reason for this dismal showing by Democratic women.
This page is the prototype for 2008. The data and map will refer to previous
elections until serious polls begin in 2008. The blog will be updated when
there is interesting news about the 2008 races.
Welcome
FAQs
Donations
Icons for bloggers
Previous elections
Electoral coll. graph
Cartogram
Animated maps
Data galore
All Senate races
Hot House races
Political websites
Articles and books
Political humor
