• Strongly Dem (42)
  • Likely Dem (3)
  • Barely Dem (2)
  • Exactly tied (0)
  • Barely GOP (1)
  • Likely GOP (3)
  • Strongly GOP (49)
  • No Senate race
This date in 2022 2018 2014
New polls:  
Dem pickups : (None)
GOP pickups : (None)
Political Wire logo Former Trump Lawyer Defends Jack Smith
White House Rallies Around Susie Wiles After Interview
Miriam Adelson Offered Trump $250 Million to Run Again
Greene Says Dam Is Breaking Against Trump
Trump Hits All Time Low in Handling of Economy
Trump Dangles Cash Payments to Buoy Voters

When Someone Shows You Who They Are...

...believe them the first time. That is what Maya Angelou supposedly said, though note that all sources for that quote are secondhand. In any event, it's a good observation, whether Angelou came up with it herself or not.

Truth be told, we already knew what kind of person Donald Trump is. We've been writing about Trump the politician for a decade now, and he's shown over and over and over that he's boorish, and petty, and self-important, and mean-spirited, and utterly lacking in class (despite the liberal use of gilded decorations that are supposed to make us think otherwise). There's the Barack Obama birth certificate conspiracies, and the mockery of the disabled reporter, and "grab 'em by the pu**y," and the various snubs of John McCain's memory, and the nasty nicknames for various political opponents, and the palling around with Jeffrey Epstein, and the Mohammad bin Salman ballwashing, and... well, it goes on and on. And note, this is not a list of things that are illegal or are bad governance (though some of them are arguably that, as well). It's just a few of the high-profile examples in which Trump showed the world that he's a godawful excuse for a human being.

Once in a while, though—and it's very rare these days, after 10 years of developing Trumpian armor—he manages to surprise us with his utter and complete lack of grace. So it was yesterday. Among the first tasks of the day for (Z) are to check e-mail and cell phone messages. And both personal and Electoral-Vote.com channels were flooded with messages about the unbelievably classless message that Trump sent out on his a-pathetic-place-for-pathetic-people social media platform. In case you haven't seen it already, here it is:

A very sad thing happened last night in Hollywood. Rob Reiner, a tortured and struggling, but once very talented movie director and comedy star, has passed away, together with his wife, Michele, reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME, sometimes referred to as TDS. He was known to have driven people CRAZY by his raging obsession of President Donald J. Trump, with his obvious paranoia reaching new heights as the Trump Administration surpassed all goals and expectations of greatness, and with the Golden Age of America upon us, perhaps like never before. May Rob and Michele rest in peace!

Honestly—and we were not the only ones who reacted this way—we initially thought it was a fake from some sort of parodist. But it's not. And in case there was any doubt, Trump doubled down during a press conference yesterday, telling reporters: "I was not a fan of Rob Reiner at all, in any way shape or form. I thought he was very bad for our country."

Just in case you might think we were having a bad day, or something along those lines, here are a few messages from readers who were also disgusted by Trump's response:

D.E. in Lancaster, PA, writes: I've tried several times to write a measured response to Trump's obscene comments on the horrible and senseless murders of Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele, but failed with each attempt. All I can muster is: Is it too much to ask that we have a human being with a some sense of empathy for our president, or, if that's a hill too steep for him to shuffle up, for someone to shut him the fu** up? That's my Christmas/Hanukkah/Kwanzaa/Winter Solstice wish. Just take him away some place where he can yell till his little chest cavity's content, but where we don't have to hear his filth, ever again.

That and I just donated to Indivisible to hopefully aid in their organization of the next No Kings Rally.

To the incredibly talented and generous Rob Reiner, your life and works impacted mine in so many ways, and to his lovely wife, Michele: "Zichrono/Zichrona Livracha." To the surviving children, even to his troubled son who is charged with these horrible murders: "Min haShamayin Tenuhamu."



T.J.R. in Metuchen, NJ, writes: I try hard to be fair. I try very hard to be fair and charitable. I try to appreciate every human being's value. I try hard to value other's opinions, even though I disagree with them. People have different experiences than I do. I understand that. And these experiences may have led them to opinions different than my own. I get that. I truly do.

But Donald Trump's comment on Rob Reiner's death has crossed a boundary I didn't believe could ever—ever—be broached. And I call him by his name so there can be no doubt who I mean.

He has crossed any bound of simple human decency. Crossed where 99.99999999% of humanity would never dare cross, simply because they are, in essence, humane.

I constantly tell my partner that nothing Trump does shocks me. She is perpetually aghast by his actions, but I keep saying, "It's Trump. What can you expect?" This has surpassed that. This is more reprehensible than I even thought him capable of.

Although I am not a believer in God or heaven and hell, on this, in this instance, I sincerely hope I am wrong. When Donald Trump passes, may he burn in eternal torment in hell's damnation.

I also just pray that his followers see the reprehensibility of his words. And look within themselves and realize they are chaining their souls to a false idol.



A.B. in Wendell, NC, writes: This. Is. Not. Normal.

This is how the current occupant of The White House reacts to the tragic death of Rob Reiner and his wife? "[Reiner] was known to have driven people CRAZY by his raging obsession of President Donald J. Trump."

No, Donald. The only person with a raging obsession of Donald J. Trump is YOU, as witnessed by the fact that you have to make EVERYTHING about YOU.

The facts are not all known yet, but it would seem that Reiner's son Nick is responsible... and that points to family dynamics as a more likely cause. This is a tragedy for all involved. For ONCE IN YOUR LIFE can you be respectful, and not make it about YOU?



D.S. in Layton, UT writes: Fu**ing a**hole.

So, yeah, it wasn't just us who felt that way.

Oh, and Trump condemnation was all over the Internet yesterday, from all sides of the political spectrum. He was slammed by an entire panel on Fox, shortly after the aforementioned press conference; while at least a dozen other Foxers blasted Trump on social media. Quite a number of evangelical leaders also spoke up. For example, Russell Moore, editor in chief of Christianity Today, wrote: "How this vile, disgusting, and immoral behavior has become normalized in the United States is something our descendants will study in school, to the shame of our generation."

And now, because we are academics who try to see the meaning behind things, here are the things we take from this ugly incident:

  • Ego: It's already been said above, but let's say it again: Trump is an egoist well beyond the point of mere dysfunction. When the National Guard soldier died, he made it about him, and said he might attend her funeral because he won West Virginia by such a large margin. When Charlie Kirk died, Trump gave a eulogy, and made it all about himself. And now, Rob Reiner is dead, and once again, Trump is the star of the story, at least in his own mind. What an unbelievable narcissist. And then for him to claim that Reiner's criticism of Trump was "bad for our country"? Seriously? First of all, Mr. President, you don't give a damn about "our country." You sort of care about 35% of "our country," sometimes. And besides that, criticism of our leaders is GOOD for our country, and shows democracy is still working and authoritarianism hasn't taken over, quite yet.

    Although we guess that explains entirely why Trump sees Reiner's criticism as bad for "our country." After all, if l'état, c'est moi, then anything bad for moi is bad for l'état.

  • Hypocrisy: We've said it before, and we'll undoubtedly say it again, but Trump also showed, yet again, what an unbelievable hypocrite he is. Remember what Jimmy Kimmel said after Charlie Kirk's murder: "We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it." There is not a word in there about Charlie Kirk himself, and yet Trump and the rest of MAGA absolutely DEMANDED that Kimmel be fired (and, ideally, drawn and quartered). Is there any world in which the things Trump said about Reiner are not orders of magnitude worse? And yet, Trump isn't going to resign, nor is anyone MAGA going to call for him to do so.

    Incidentally, when Kirk died, Reiner was on Piers Morgan's show. And the remarks he offered were the epitome of class and decency, such that the clip of that appearance went viral yesterday.

  • All for One, One for All?: One of the most insidious tricks in modern politics, practiced with particular enthusiasm on the right, is to make all members of a particular political faction responsible for the words and actions of individual members. That trick was most certainly on display yesterday. Trump apologists (with Greg Gutfeld and Kurt Schlicter the loudest, perhaps) said, in so many words: "Well, it was OK when leftists said mean things about Charlie Kirk? Why the double standard?" Even many Trump critics, on the right, said something along the lines of: "Just because the left said nasty things about Charlie Kirk doesn't mean that Trump should behave the same."

    Is it true that some number of left-wing people, mostly on social media, said reprehensible things about Kirk and his death? Yes, it is. But do you know what every single one of those people has in common? None of them are the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. A few hotheads who pop off do not speak for their whole party, or their whole segment of the political spectrum, and it's dishonest to pretend otherwise. On the other hand, the president, pretty much by definition, DOES speak for his whole party. And even a partial apology on his behalf is entirely inappropriate.

    Oh, and for the record, every single leader of the Democratic Party said the appropriate things when Kirk was murdered. Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)—they all showed how to behave with class. That is because they are grown-ups, and they know there's a time to put politics and personal grievances aside.

  • It's His Party, and He'll Cry if He Wants To: Notice that we have yet to talk about actual Republican officeholders who were critical of Trump's vile words. That is because there weren't many of them. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) and Thomas Massie (R-KY) both condemned his words in no uncertain terms, but they are both Trump foes. Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY), who happens to be running in a district that is very Jewish, also had measured but critical words for the President. Rep. Stephanie Bice (R-OK) posted that the tragedy should not be about politics. And that's the end of the list. Trump's grip on the Republican Party might be weakening, but it's not yet "weak." Even if Republicans are sometimes willing to push back on policy these days, they are still sticking their heads in the sand when it comes to boorish behavior, no matter how boorish it might be.

  • Bad Instincts: Actually, we're not sure if Trump just doesn't care about politics anymore, or if he's just losing his fastball. Whatever the case may be, his vile words about Reiner were colossally stupid from a political perspective. We will bet every dollar we have that Trump did not win over a single voter with yesterday's performance. Any person who thinks it's a good thing to crow when a "lib" dies was already voting for Trump. Meanwhile, it is utterly classless demonstrations like this that prove to be the breaking point for a former Trump voter here, and another former Trump voter there. It is clear, at this point, that Trumpism and MAGA will die from a thousand cuts, and he inflicted a couple dozen of those cuts on himself yesterday, while gaining nothing.

  • Oscar: As long as we're here anyhow, we'll give you a bonus takeaway. Beyond his very important work as an actor, Reiner directed some of the most enduring films of our times. A Few Good Men. This Is Spinal Tap. The Princess Bride. Stand By Me. The American President. When Harry Met Sally. Misery. Not only is that an unbelievable body of work, but it's remarkably diverse in terms of genres and subject matter. And how many Oscars did Reiner receive? Zero. In fact, he was never even nominated for directing (and was only ever nominated once in any category, for producing A Few Good Men).

    We are not going to tell you the Oscars mean nothing. They do reward a certain kind of artist and a certain kind of art; in the case of directors, they go to people whose directing style reminds you "There's an auteur at work here; watch and be dazzled!" The Oscars do not go to directors whose work is so smooth and so seamless, you forget they are there. In the end, if we were filmmakers, we would rather have Reiner's résumé than that of something like 98% of Best Director winners. Heck, we'd be happy with just The Princess Bride and This Is Spinal Tap.

And that's the biggest news of the day. Sigh. (Z)

Trump Declares Fentanyl a "Weapon of Mass Destruction"

Just in case his ill-conceived vendetta against Rob Reiner wasn't enough, Donald Trump made some additional headlines with a new executive order, one that "officially" designates "illicit fentanyl and its core precursor chemicals as Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)." You can read the XO here, if you wish.

We will note, yet again, that we really don't know what Trump's agenda is these days. Is he trying to create a distraction from EpsteinScam, or from his various grifts, or from his poor approval ratings? Is he trying to start a war, so he can then lean more fully into the fascism than he's already doing? Is he desperately trying to juice up MAGA in advance of the midterms? Is he just a brain-addled old man who does whatever crazy things that Steven Miller or Stephen Bannon or Secretary of Small Dongs Defense Pete Hegseth tell him to do?

In any event, we'll just pass along these four observations:

  • The Trump administration is not the first to toy around with this idea; a few people in the Biden White House kicked it around before dismissing it as impracticable and legally indefensible. Yes, it is true that small amounts of fentanyl can kill large numbers of people. The same is true for enriched uranium, when placed into the right kind of delivery vehicle. However, that is where the commonalities end. One of those things is a weapon of mass destruction, and the other is not. And if fentanyl IS a weapon of mass destruction, then that term is well on the path to having no real meaning anymore, like "terrorist" or "socialist."

  • We will also remind readers that Trump cannot unilaterally change American law with the stroke of his autopen. When Trump woke up yesterday, U.S. law defined weapons of mass destruction as "any weapon involving a biological agent, toxin, or vector," as well as "any weapon that is designed to release radiation or radioactivity at a level dangerous to human life." When Trump awakens today, U.S. law will still define weapons of mass destruction in that way. All he can do with an XO is order the executive departments to behave in a manner consistent with his "interpretation" of what fentanyl is. Largely, and the XO lays this out, if you read it, that means a lot of bureaucrats doing bureaucratic things.

    The problem is that fentanyl IS NOT a biological agent, toxin, vector or weapon, by any coherent meaning of those terms.

  • Venezuela is not an important player in the fentanyl trade. In fact, it's not a player at all, because the hated Nicolás Maduro cracked down on the drug years ago. Not only does that nation not produce fentanyl, it doesn't even serve as a transit corridor for the drug. If you're after cocaine production, then Venezuela is the place to go, but not fentanyl. So, if Trump uses his new XO as justification for increasing the number of civilian boats the U.S. Navy blows out of the water, or the number of fishermen who are murdered, or the number of oil tankers seized, you will know that the XO was just smoke and mirrors in service of his undeclared war against Maduro.

  • Meanwhile, most of the fentanyl in the U.S. begins life in China. So, if Trump does not use this XO to impose some sort of new penalties or restrictions on the Chinese, then you will also know that the XO was just smoke and mirrors in service of his undeclared war against Maduro.

And now, we wait and see what happens. (Z)

Trump Always Chickens Out, Empire State Edition

The Republican Party has a problem in New York State. There is one person who can plausibly do something about it, but he refuses to get involved. And so, GOP operatives are currently busy tearing their hair out.

The problem is the gubernatorial race. The people of New York have sent just one member of the red team to the governor's mansion in the last half-century, but Republicans like their chances in 2026. Gov. Kathy Hochul (D-NY) is not terribly popular, and the GOP wants to portray her as both a tool of the upstate elites (an old trick, going at least as far back as complaints of Martin Van Buren's "Albany Regency") and yet also a clone of Zohran Mamdani. The Republicans think this might just be the path to the promised land.

The issue is that even if Hochul is vulnerable, disunity on the Republican side simply will not do. A messy primary will cost a lot of money and will leave the winner bruised and bleeding. And a messy primary is what is on tap, at least as of the moment. On one side is Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), and on the other side is Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman (R). They're both very MAGA, they both have a relationship with Donald Trump. Usually, when it's MAGA vs. MAGA, the contest turns into a lot of personal attacks and a lot of claims about who is the Trumpiest. And Democratic operatives are going to record every single one of those statements, so they can put them in ads once the primaries are over.

Trump, of course, could ride to his Party's rescue by making an endorsement. It would be hard for someone to keep going as "the MAGA candidate" if the other person has Trump's backing. But, as much as Republican operatives beg, Trump refuses to pick a horse. Instead, he's picked TWO horses, doing the thing he does where he endorses BOTH candidates. That's good for purposes of his peacocking on social media, we suppose, since he can claim to be on the winning side no matter what happens. It's not great for his political party, though.

Truth be told, we believe the Republican thinking on this race is pure fantasy. It is possible that, one day not too far in the future, New York will again have a Republican governor. But it's not going to be in 2026. Hochul is not especially popular, but she's not radioactive, the way that Andrew Cuomo might be. There's also the great likelihood that all Republicans are going to face midterm-backlash headwinds. Oh, and just as we don't believe an outspoken lefty can win statewide in Texas, we don't believe a MAGA candidate can win in New York. It would have to be a normal Republican, not a Trump sycophant. Also, the GOP strategy here is basically nonsensical. They're going to sell Hochul as a wild-eyed leftist upstate, but as a tool-of-the-establishment centrist in NYC? Do they think there is a wall running through Woodstock that keeps sound from crossing over? Do they think voters in the various parts of the state aren't going to figure out that the Republicans are selling two very different Hochuls, and they couldn't possibly both be true?

Since we don't actually see much relevance to the New York governor's race here, that means there's only one reason to talk about this story, and it's Trump. Once again, he shows he doesn't have the spine to make tough choices when it involves people who have flattered him and puffed up his ego. We have no doubt that Stefanik and Blakeman have found a way to make sure he knows how very impressed they are with his having won the FIFA Peace Prize. Such an important honor!

Also, it's reminder #237 that Trump doesn't give two craps about his Party's fortunes; he only cares about his own needs and his own image. After all, what's it to him if Hochul remains as governor? Truth be told, that's probably better for him than if one of the Republicans wins, since he can use Hochul as a bugaboo when needed. In any event, the needs of Trump and the needs of the GOP will continue to diverge, and the longer that GOP muckety-mucks refuse to accept and deal with that fact, the more damage that will be done. (Z)

Twelve Days of Christmas... Games, Part VI: Putting the T and the V in... Hanukkah?

This was the game that was supposed to run yesterday. We held it, of course, and under the circumstances, we strongly considered swapping out the first question. However, we have no doubt that Rob Reiner would want his work to be remembered, and erasing him seems exactly the wrong thing to do. So, the first question stays.

The game is pretty basic. We've given screen shots and summations of eight episodes, from U.S. TV shows, episodes that had a significant Hanukkah element. You just have to identify the shows. (Please no Google, etc., for this one; that would make it too easy.)

Here are the episodes:

The show's four
protagonists stand in the doorway to their house with shocked looks on their faces

Episode Title: "Archie Is Branded"
Air Date: February 24, 1973
Synopsis: Although 1970s shows relied heavily on Jewish talent, particularly behind the scenes, they had to keep the Jewish-centric stuff a bit under the radar most of the time. So, it's only implied that it's during Hanukkah that the Bunkers have a swastika painted on their front door. They receive a visit from Paul Benjamin, of the Hebrew Defense Association, who tells them their house was mistaken for that of a nearby Jewish neighbor.

What's the TV show?



A man with a rabbinic
beard and a blue-and-white Santa Claus-style hat.

Episode Title: "Andie MacDowell/Tracy Chapman"
Air Date: December 16, 1989
Synopsis: Santa Claus falls ill, and "Hanukkah Harry" has to fill in. He pulls it off, though at great peril to his own life.

What's the TV show?



Jerry, George and
Elaine stand beneath a banner that says 'Happy Hanukkah'

Episode Title: "The Strike"
Air Date: December 18, 1997
Synopsis: The episode has three subplots. One involves railing against the commercialization of Christmas. A second involves a labor action at a bagel shop. And the third involves Jerry, Elaine and George attending a tacky Hanukkah party. "This place is like Studio 54 with a menorah," Elaine notes haughtily.

What's the TV show?



Fran, dressed in 1960's garb, holds a menorah

Episode Title: "The Hanukkah Story"
Air Date: December 16, 1998
Synopsis: The newly married Fran looks forward to celebrating Hanukkah with her husband, but he and the family are en route to New York City from Boston, there isn't enough gas in the car, and there are no gas stations open because of a massive snowstorm. Somehow, 1 hour's worth of gas lasts for 8 hours of driving, and they get back just in time.

What's the TV show?



Superman and Santa Claus sit on a couch watching, while a man
in an armadillo costume holds an elementary-school-aged boy on his lap

Episode Title: "The One With the Holiday Armadillo"
Air Date: December 14, 2000
Synopsis: Ross is chagrined to learn that his son Ben knows nothing of Hanukkah, and he isn't too interested in hearing about it from his father. So, taking a cue from Santa Claus and Superman, Ross invents the Holiday Armadillo to help teach the story.

What's the TV show?



A teenager in a tacky holiday sweater holds a menorah

Episode Title: "The Best Chrismukkah Ever"
Air Date: December 3, 2003
Synopsis: Seth Cohen invents a hybrid Hanukkah-Christmas holiday, so all his friends and family can participate. Because the show is a teen-focused soap opera, much teen drama ensues.

What's the TV show?



The three kids stand around
a spherical tree, decorated with Hanukkah ornaments and colors. It just looks like a ball-shaped Christmas tree, though.

Episode Title: "A Christmas Story"
Air Date: December 9, 2015
Synopsis: Disappointed by her kids' lack of interest in Hanukkah, Beverly creates "Super Hanukkah," though every idea she comes up with for the "new" holiday ends up being a pretty clear knock-off of one Christmas tradition or another.

What's the TV show?



A man in his sixties stands
next to a holiday display that includes garlands and a menorah

Episode Title: "Merry Christmas, Johnny Rose"
Air Date: December 19, 2018
Synopsis: Johnny Rose decides that his down-on-its-luck family needs to have a whiz-bang Christmas celebration, even though the holiday is only 12 hours away. "That reminds me!," he declares. "Somebody needs to find the menorah!"

What's the TV show?

And the tiebreaker question. Several years ago, the Hallmark Channel announced it would begin producing one Hanukkah movie a year. This year's entry is Oy (To the World). On a scale of 0 to 10, and keeping in mind the site's ratings go to one decimal point (e.g., 3.5), what is the movie's average rating on IMDB right now?

Submit your answers here! (Z)

Twelve Days of Christmas... Games, Part I: Ugly Sweaters (Answers and Results)

And now, our first set of answers and results:

1. December 5:

The sweatshirt says 'WIE ZOET IS KRIJGT LEKKERS

a. Sinterklaas (69.6%)
b. St. Swithin's Day (6%)
c. Lek Gifting Day (Albania) (13.4%)
d. Unification Day (Germany) (11.1%)

Comments: We had many readers write in to point out "errors" in our various multiple choice options. Part of the art of writing wrong answers (known, in technical terms, as "distractors") is including blatantly erroneous ones, so that test takers who are in the know can eliminate those choices. For the record, we knew full well that St. Swithin's Day is celebrated on July 15, while Germany's Unification Day is October 3. There is no such thing as Lek Gifting Day (though the Lek IS the official currency of Albania).



2. December 14:

The sweater says 'THIS IS HOW WE JEW IT' and has dreidels, Stars of David and menorahs

a. Simchat Torah (0% of readers chose this answer)
b. Hanukkah (88.9%)
c. World Dreidel Championships (Final Round) (10.1%)
d. Rabbi Appreciation Day (1%)

Comments: Simchat Torah is typically in October, while Rabbi Appreciation Day is on June 13th (aka 6/13) because there are 613 mitzvot (commandments) in the Torah. There are no World Dreidel Championships, which seems like a missed opportunity.



3. December 15:

The sweater is green and white and says 'FA-LA-LA-LA F*CK SCOTUS

a. Founders' Day (Democratic Socialists of America) (19.4%)
b. Bill of Rights Day (70.5%)
c. Public Defenders' Appreciation Day (6.9%)
d. Sen. Bernie Sanders' (I-VT) Birthday (3.2%)

Comments: Bernie was born on September 8, and it's actually National Public Defender Week, not Day (and it's in March anyhow). The DSA do not have a Founders' Day.



4. December 17:

An ugly brown and purple sweater with a drawing of a plane and the words 'Wright Bros.'

a. Wright Brothers Day (66.7%)
b. International Aviation Week (23.6%)
c. North Carolina Heritage Day (5.6%)
d. Pilot Appreciation Day (4.2%)

Comments: Pilot Appreciation Day is April 26, there is no International Aviation Week (though there's a National one in August), and North Carolina Heritage Day does not exist officially, though there are unofficial celebrations with that name at various times across the state.



5. December 21:

Brown background, decorative elements in green that look like Maltese Crosses, a wreath at the center, and a pentagram within the wreath

a. Birthday of Anton LaVey (Founder of the Satanic Church) (10.6%)
b. Winter Solstice (72.2%)
c. Samhain (Druids) (16.2%)
d. International Heavy Metal Day (1%)

Comments: LaVey was born April 11, Samhain coincides with Halloween, and International Heavy Metal Day is not celebrated on December 21. Some prefer to commemorate it on December 12 (aka 12/12), while others have pushed to move it to November 11 (aka 11/11) in reference to Nigel Tufnel's amp in This Is Spinal Tap.



6. December 21, Also:

Black background, and a pattern with white question marks. There is a white bar across the sweater, and marching across is something that looks like upside-down snow cones

a. International Dalek Remembrance Day (81.9%)
b. Giving Tuesday (2.7%)
c. Ashura (4.6%)
d. Little Yule (9.7%)

Comments: We thought that a lot of readers would say "There's NO WAY there's an International Dalek Remembrance Day," but we were wrong. Giving Tuesday is the Tuesday after Thanksgiving (December 2 this year), Ashura was in June this year, and Little Yule (aka St. Lucy's Day) happens on December 13.



7. December 22:

Cream background, red trim, a bunch of winter symbols like snowmen and santas, and on the chest are a half-dozen GIANT math symbols, like square root and infinity

a. Founders' Day (M.I.T.) (10.6%)
b. Nerd Appreciation Day (4.1%)
c. National Mathematics Day (U.S.) (80.6%)
d. Albert Einstein's Birthday (4.6%)

Comments: There is no Founders Day at MIT, and there's no Nerd Appreciation Day (though Geek Pride Day is celebrated on May 25, primarily because that is the day Star Wars opened in 1977, though it's also connected to Douglas Adams' Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy). Einstein was born on March 14.



8. December 25:

A crocheted sweater with a reindeer that is clearly meant to be Rudolph, but has crazy eyes

a. National Mental Health Awareness Week (Canada) (4.6%)
b. International Save the Reindeer Day (14.7%)
c. Christmas (78.3%)
d. Techno Day (2.4%)

Comments: Canada does not have a commemoration under that name, though it does have Mental Illness Awareness Week in October. Techno Day is celebrated on December 9, and there is no International Save the Reindeer Day. Note that we actually made up a lot of these answers (e.g., Techno Day), only to learn later that there are holidays for damn near everything.



9. December 26:

Blue and red background, various winter decorations, and the center is a cat in a cowboy costume holding gifts, with the word 'UMOJA' underneath

a. Kwanzaa (71.9%)
b. Umoja (Saudi Arabia and parts of Syria) (12.9%)
c. Klöpfleinsnächte (Knocking Nights) (8.8%)
d. Cat Appreciation Day (Egypt) (6.5%)

Comments: "Umoja" is Kiswahili for "unity." and is the first principle of Kwanzaa. It is not a holiday in Saudi Arabia, Syria or anywhere else. Knocking Nights take place on the three Thursdays before Christmas. And Egyptians do not celebrate Cat Appreciation Day. Maybe they did 5,000 years ago, but not today.



10. December 26, Also:

A figure that looks like Mike Tyson, carrying a bag of gifts, and the caption 'MERRY CHRITHMITH'

a. International Speech Impediment Awareness Day (6.9%)
b. Mike Tyson's Birthday (27.6%)
c. Procrastinators Day (0%)
d. Boxing Day (65.4%)

Comments: International Speech Impediment Awareness Day, more commonly known as International Stuttering Awareness Day, takes place on October 22. That's another one we didn't know about until after we posted this game. National Procrastination Week (not Day) is usually held in March, but is sometimes pushed back (really!). Mike Tyson was born on June 30.



11. December 28:

A white sweater with a bunch of giant, 3-D vegetables

a. International Farmers Day (17.5%)
b. Eat Vegetarian Day (32.7%)
c. Veg Out After the Holidays Day (34.6%)
d. Ōmisoka (Japanese New Year) (15.2%)

Comments: Ōmisoka is actually Japanese New Year's Eve, and it takes place on the same day as New Year's Eve does in all other countries on the solar calendar. Shōgatsu is Japan's name for New Year's Day. Veg Out After the Holidays Day and International Farmers Day are completely made up.



12. December 30:

Pink background, with three ribbon-shaped lines running across it, the ribbons are the color of bacon, but look like what would happen if you took a scalpel to someone

a. Surgeon Appreciation Day (3.7%)
b. Jurassic Park Week (the first film in the franchise was released on December 30, 1995) (4.6%)
c. Bacon Day (90.7%)
d. Roadkill Appreciation Day (1%)

Comments: There's no Surgeon Appreciation Day, though they're included in National Doctors' Day on March 30. There is no Jurassic Park Week, and even if there was, the original Jurassic Park was released on June 11, 1993 (at least, in the United States). Roadkill Appreciation Day is another one we THOUGHT we were making up, but it's actually celebrated on September 25. We do not want to know HOW it's celebrated.

There were 11 readers who got perfect scores. Here they are:

  • B.N. in San Rafael, CA
  • C.S. in Erkrath, Germany
  • D.R. in Pittsburgh, PA
  • J.C. in Arlington Heights, IL
  • J.N. in Zionsville, IN
  • K.L. in Concord, CA
  • L.H. in Manchester, UK
  • L.W. in Corvallis, OR
  • M.G. and D.K. in Marseille, France
  • R.A. in Savannah, GA
  • T.B. in Leon County, FL

Tomorrow will be the answers to "Twelve Days of Christmas... Games, Part II: Christmas Movie Trivia," so if you want to play that one, click here now, because time's running out. (Z)


       
If you wish to contact us, please use one of these addresses. For the first two, please include your initials and city.

To download a poster about the site to hang up, please click here.


Email a link to a friend.

---The Votemaster and Zenger
Dec15 Could There Be a Truce in the Gerrymandering War?
Dec15 House Republicans Are Making a Last-Ditch Effort on Health Care
Dec15 Not a Merry Christmas
Dec15 DoJ Is Fighting to Block a Federal Judge from Holding a Hearing
Dec15 The Fight over Warner Bros. Is More Political Than It May Appear
Dec15 The Greatest Grifts--So Far
Dec15 New Photos Show Trump with Epstein Again
Dec15 Donald Trump and James Carville Agree on Something
Dec15 Trump Is Sued over His Ballroom
Dec15 Measles Is Back
Dec14 Sunday Mailbag
Dec13 Saturday Q&A
Dec13 Reader Question of the Week: Leisure Where?, Part III
Dec12 Health Care Vote: Four Republican Senators Say "I'm with Them"
Dec12 Too Much Winning?: Watch Truth Social, Because Trump's Gotta Be Livid Right Now
Dec12 Governance, Trump-Style, Part I: Ho, Hum, Just Your Run of the Mill Tanker Capture
Dec12 Governance, Trump-Style, Part II: I Am Donald, Man of Peace
Dec12 Governance, Trump-Style, Part III: It Would Seem D.C. Is Too Woke...
Dec12 Governance, Trump-Style, Part IV: ...But Not Racist Enough
Dec12 Crazypants Gubernatorial Candidate News: Republican Prospects Dim a Bit in Ohio, Minnesota
Dec12 I Read the News Today, Oh Boy: What Did He Know, and When Did He Know It?
Dec12 This Week in Schadenfreude: Nuzzi Book Did Not Sell Well, to Say the Least
Dec12 This Week in Freudenfreude: Thank U, Part III
Dec11 Affordability, Affordability, Affordability
Dec11 O Crap, It Is Crapo-Cassidy Time
Dec11 Trump Wants to Bail Out the Farmers He Hurt Badly
Dec11 TACO Time
Dec11 Fed Cuts Rates
Dec11 Newsom's Presidential Campaign Is Rolling Along Nicely
Dec11 Spanberger Is Lukewarm on Redistricting
Dec11 Older Voters Will Have Disproportionate Influence on the Senate
Dec11 Dan Goldman Has Another Opponent
Dec11 Democrats Have Noticed: Hey, the States Also Have Legislatures
Dec11 Judge Will Release Ghislaine Maxwell Documents
Dec11 Twelve Days of Christmas... Games, Part V: Shakespeare Sings His Hits
Dec10 Another Good Night for the Democrats
Dec10 Kristi Noem Is in Trouble...
Dec10 ...And So Is Mike Johnson
Dec10 The First Female President?
Dec10 Twelve Days of Christmas... Games, Part IV: Three Little Words
Dec09 Allred Is Texas Toast
Dec09 Will Trump Get His Map in Indiana?
Dec09 In Justice, Part I: A Tree Falls in the Forest?
Dec09 In Justice, Part II: Re-Indicted... and It Feels No Good
Dec09 In Justice, Part III: Rules for Thee but Not for Me
Dec09 Today in TV Hosting News
Dec09 Twelve Days of Christmas... Games, Part III: Pictograms
Dec08 Miami Will Elect a New Mayor Tomorrow
Dec08 Supreme Court De Facto Approves the New Texas Map
Dec08 Can Congress Create Independent Agencies?